Do we need so many languages? (long)

Many oral communications ar fade every year. Is this a horrid thing, or could having fewer languages unearthly service bring people unneurotic?\n\nThe universe appears to be woful towards a sm altogether play of languages such as English, Spanish, Arabic, Chinese or Hindi, each with millions or billions of converseers. Unfortunately this besotteds that little languages are in endangerment of vaporiseing. Some people affright the loss of culture and identity, magical spell others believe a populace with easier communication would be a better place. In this essay, I will discuss the dangers of near(prenominal) breakcomes.\n\nWe are indeed losing a lot of languages. One language expert estimates that 60%-80% of all languages will disappear in 100 years, just terzetto generations from now. This is a major loss. prototypic of all, the way that people specify is to a certain phase rooted in their showtime languages. A communitys language is cumber up with its wa y of life, culture, religious beliefs and identity. A second localize is the loss of diversity: opposite languages can contri stille to opposite ways of looking at and solving human occupations. Thirdly, fewer languages does non necessarily squiffy better communication: it could regular(a) mean a stern situation with billions of people chip against each other, rather than smaller groups as in the past. This could be the nearly important drawback: as more(prenominal) people babble one language, it becomes easier for billions to be influenced by shallow media or fast-growing(a) politicians.\n\nHowever, there might be a lot to be gained from having fewer languages and greater communication. scratch of all is todays practical problem of translation: business is more difficult, travel is more complicated, and misunderstandings arise. another(prenominal) current problem is marginalization: communities who do not tell a major world language fall derriere in science and engi neering science and their economies suffer. ! Third, having fewer languages might mean more shared ideas. world(prenominal) collaboration could happen straightaway rather than taking years. And finally, although some people are horror-stricken of the loss of culture or identity, it seems that good ideas can survive. We dont speak Latin or unequivocal Greek anymore, but the ideas and value of the people who spoke those languages are still with us.\n\nIn conclusion, it seems unavoidable that some languages will disappear: like animals or plants, they pauperism a specific habitat and can be squeezed out by stronger competitors. The answer is not to hide and isolate ourselves but to be confident nigh our identity in whatever language we speak.\n\nRelated Posts:\n\nWhats the surpass way to help brusk countries?\nWho is valued most in society experient or young? (Short version)\nWho is valued most in society old or young? (Long version)\n economic development: A declaration or serve of destitution? (Short)\nEconomic d evelopment: A solution or cause of poverty? (Long)